The brilliance and failure of "LUMIX" lies in the "two-knife flow" of "GM" & "S"?

Send

The photographers who highly appraised the photographic performance of LUMIX and bought and used it out of their own pocket.

At the beginning of the New year in 2022, the commercial media published an article saying, "Panasonic, the first person in the world to send Miller-free to the world, is struggling with a decline in market share", causing a sensation among photography lovers. The photographer who bought and used several LUMIX series out of his own pocket said: "the reported LUMIX share shift chart is very similar to the existence of LUMIX in my photo life." He asked me to talk about the past dynasties of LUMIX where infatuation, where people feel less than satisfactory, to see what is the subject of the status quo. [image] LUMIX G5 installed function lever. Not long ago, I read that Panasonic's digital camera (mirrorless aircraft) was upset by the inadvertently low market share of Panasonic's digital camera. "LUMIX's market share is in the single digits," he said. Just knowing at a glance, it doesn't care much about keeping it as it is, because LUMIX has a low share of Miller-free aircraft and doesn't have that much doubt, unexpected ideas, and so on. Mm-hmm. Yeah. And? That's why. Panasonic is the biological parent of a Miller-free plane. It is reported that in 2008, when the world's first Miller-free aircraft, the LUMIX G1, emerged, 95 per cent of Miller-free aircraft sales were actually made by Panasonic. But in a world where there are "no other Miller-free planes", in a sense, this is Atalima's number. Later, Geely lost its market share, probably because of the increase in the choice of Miller-free aircraft in the first place. Of course, the "failure to widely display overwhelming charm" is a gory fact and result. The rise of smartphones may also be unexpected in terms of strategic planning. In this case, I have a "lens-switched LUMIX", the captive past of Panasonic microelectronic fighters. The decline in market share feels "things around us" as we do. It sounds like a common story with no novelty at all. In fact, there is a microcosm of this in our family. The first obsession with the advanced, charismatic LUMIX for about three years was the 2009 release of "GH1" (June 2009). Much smaller than full-size DSLRs (Nikon "D3" and "D700" were used at the time), there was an interest in miniature camera systems that could be carried more easily at any time than DSLRs with APS-C sensors. In retrospect, although it was very vague at that time, I seemed to have begun to explore the next step of my own DSLR. In the same year, I also bought "GF1", which is different from the GH1 character (September 2009), which is quite real "flirting". He was awarded "GH2" in the second year (October 2010). Under the premise of being used in commissioned work (photography), this is the first non-mirror plane that has been bought. It should be pointed out here that although Sony's mirrorless plane "NEX-5" (June 2010) was already bought at that time, it still dared to buy two GH2. The future assassin, NEX-5, which can also be said to be a scout, but equipped with a larger APS-C sensor than Forthers, kit lens description performance and change the lens lineup with less drag movement, was just a weak position at the time. The decision to use the "GF3" (July 2011) purchased through the tool "GF2" (December 2010), as a regular laptop to take advantage of the ultra-small body, is a very useful model. Make full use of the two hangers, in the state of holding from the neck, mainly using 14 mm single-focus lens, actively practice the continuous shooting of the "memo animation photography". For me, it can also be said to make me notice the existence of new methods related to animation. Secondly, the resulting "GX1" (November 2011) is a model to improve the practicability of high-sensitivity picture quality and AF movements of moving objects. Personally, it feels like minicomputers are over a wall and use 2 sets with external EVF more densely than GH2. "if it is a simple moving object, you can track the AF, under certain conditions, it is not impossible to replace the SLR camera." GX1 felt the dramatic evolution of the microprocessor. Captivated by the sudden assassin "OM-D", LUMIX's loss was shaken, but the sense of existence of GX1 began to waver in less than a year. Because Olympus (at that time) released the same micro-forum size "OM-D", as its first bullet body, released "E-M5" to the world (March 2012) (however, the mirrorless aircraft made by Olympus according to the micro-forum specification was the first PEN E-P1 released in July 2009). I think OM-D has a backbone thought that pays more attention to "photos" than Panasonic's "G" and "GH". Reminiscent of the design of the OM fuselage in the film age, although it is also very sticky, it is nostalgic and fresh in the digital age. In addition, because it is the same standard "replacement lens can basically be shared", with the manufacturer of the transition, if the wall between the microcontroller is not very high. Taking advantage of the advent of E-M5, I replaced all my mini cameras with OM-D (Panasonic's replacement lens continued to be used like that). That said, it was followed by the surprising "G5" (September 2012) and GX7 (September 2013), and the GM1, which features an ultra-small body (November 2013), turned out to be more heavily used than the GX7. However, the GM series was also out of breath to become Discom. Finally, personally, although it is said that "Ayu does not jitter", the product concept of "G" series is fumbling until "G6" (June 2013) ("Ayu does not jitter", the correct is the CM copy of LUMIX's small digital camera). The "GH" series has been fully oriented towards animation since "GH3" (December 2012). As a camera, it is like giving up the advantages of a microcomputer, and most importantly, I don't feel the corruption of Panasonic only if I don't let the GM series of ultra-miniature Nesbardi continue to exist, just like the charm of miniature Fox. In the case of poor sales performance, I am afraid it is extremely difficult to seek the survival of the GM series. Among the remaining topics in LUMIX and the functional relevance of the existence of LUMIX, companies have no doubt and interest in the posture of tenacious through-contrast AF in promoting the phase difference of image plane AF. Completely hate pixel interpolation, is animation priority performance, or is there any other reason? It's almost the place where you want to solve the riddle. As for its image sensors, there is no doubt that it is unable to release new sensors with the latest technology, which is a drag. It can be said that the OM army has the same troubles. Since the improvement of the number of pixels is secondary, it is urgent to increase the "things that can be done" by greatly improving the picture quality of ultra-high sensitivity and the readout speed of the sensor size. A few years ago, I heard rumors that the development of the next generation of sensors is under way. What will happen to it in the future? It is no exaggeration to say that the status quo is that everything in the micro-forum depends on it. Although not because the full-size "S" series is a member of the "L mount Alliance", it has accepted a full-size rearview mirror aircraft that I think is suitable for a niche presence. However, as long as it is Panasonic's camera, that is the unforgivable balance. What will lens-switched LUMIX look like in a future where accounting is likely to be harsher? As a camera, it can take a different path from the full-size Milales aircraft of Canon, Sony and Nikon, and its existence is of great significance. This is already indispensable. The micrometer and full-size twin-knife flow will continue. That's the ideal. The product line that shows the habitat more clearly than "APS-C and full size" is of course unique to Panasonic. The commission of the original manuscript on the theme of "00" by Luo Xianhong Ochiai Norihiro is coming, because next time I will go to 00 company for an interview. "sure enough, you have to have your own use!" and so on, in order to buy a new camera and lens, has been placed on their own Eva, a few stars of frost. Suddenly, I noticed that I had become gullible, but that was just a type of Taurus B who continued to pretend to be cheated today. External selection committee of the 2021 camera Grand Prix.

Luo he Xianhong